ClickCease

Tag Archives: Motor Truck Carrier

Carmack Amendment on the Liability of Carriers Who Provide Warehousing Services

Carmack Amendment on the Liability of Carriers Who Provide Warehousing Services

The Carmack Amendment establishes the liability of a carrier for damages or loss of goods incurred during transportation. The Act also defines transportation as services related to the movement of goods including making arrangements for their receipt, and storage. A carrier who offers warehousing services of freight during transit, therefore, bears strict liability for the goods during this storage period in the warehouse.

As a warehouseman, one is expected to exercise reasonable care for the goods in the warehouse. They are subject to liability if the goods are damaged or lost as a result of negligence, but they are exempted if the damages could not be prevented by their exercise of reasonable care. For example, a warehouse can site an act of God to defend itself against a liability claim. This defense, however, only works if the warehouseman did not foresee the impending loss.

Warehouses cannot insert clauses that contravene the required standard of care in the dispensation of their services. Such provisions, although they are part of their contract with the customer are ineffective. Increasing and assuming voluntary liability beyond the provided standard of care is however permitted.

The liability of a carrier who is also a warehouseman can also extend to third parties even though the warehouse has no contractual agreement with them. For example, when you enter into a contract with a customer who stores their freight with your repository before you deliver the cargo to their destination, you have to exercise reasonable care over the goods as a warehouseman. In the case that the goods are damaged and consequentially a third party, such as the manufacturer who sold the products to your customer incurs financial loses and a tainted reputation due to your negligence, the third party is allowed to file claims for tort liability against you.

 

 

The Future of Self-Driving Trucks for Cargo Delivery

Self driving truck for cargo delivery

Self-driving cars are ubiquitous in the news lately, though you don’t hear enough about the future of self-driving trucks. It’s not that it’s not happening, because we’re seeing a lot of experiments with them now.

One of the most recent tests is through Daimler and a semi-autonomous freight truck. This new truck is on a fast-track to compete with Google in getting cars and trucks on the road without drivers.

The question is, will this truly affect cargo delivery truck driver jobs? As a subject worthy of debate, it’s worth exploring the impact.

How Soon Will We See Self-Driving Trucks On Our Highways?

Daimler above already has their self-driving truck on the highways of Nevada. Since then, other trucking companies have begun to experiment doing the same thing. Company names like Otto, Volvo, and Peterbilt have joined Daimler in creating self-driving trucks across our nation’s highways.

You’re seeing a push to get these out there because of the economic benefits compared to ordinary self-driving cars. Considering many of them have far more efficiency in how they operate and in stopping for fuel, the argument is how they’re going to complement cargo delivery trucker jobs.

Will Self-Driving Trucks Help or Hurt Cargo Delivery Drivers?

One problem not usually addressed is the shortage of truck drivers out there. Reports are the industry is short over 40,000 drivers as of 2015. This shortage has expectation to grow exponentially into the next decade.

With this in mind, self-driving trucks for cargo delivery could help many existing drivers under pressure to keep up their duties. So many truckers already suffer from sleep deprivation due to long driving hours.

A self-driving truck can alleviate these pressures of truckers while merely adding to their jobs rather than take them away.

It’s worth thinking about, despite self-driving trucks being a certainty on all our roads within the next two years.

 

Visit us at Logistiqins.com to use our resources for risk management consulting services for the freight broker industry.

Limiting Liability Under the Carmack Amendment

Carmack amendment

When it comes to carrier success, everything hinges on the Carmack Amendment (CA). Here is a case study that reveals that the details of terms should always be framed by the Carmack Amendment to ensure better success in limiting liability and resolving a claim favorably.

Excel, Inc. v Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. (6th Cir. 2015)

A broker arranged a shipment of pharmaceuticals, valued at more than $8 million, with the carrier. The broker and carrier entered into a Master Transportation Services Agreement (MTSA). The terms that the case would hinge upon when the freight was stolen were the ambiguous term “RVNX $2.40”, bills of lading that did not limit liability and whose signatures were on the documents.

The carrier argued that the term indicated a cargo replacement value not to exceed $2.40 per pound which would amount to about $50,000. The shipper, however, demanded that the entire $8 million loss be covered.

The broker and the shipper filed their own claims with the carrier firing back a defense citing the “RVNX $2.40” term of the MTSA. In the end, the court ruled strictly according to the CA against the carrier. Here’s what freight companies should learn from the decision:

The “RVNX $2.40” term of the MTSA did not limit liability. To limit liability under the CA, agreement must be made between the carrier and the shipper. The broker does not necessarily have the shipper’s assent to determine the carrier’s liability.

When preparing terms of shipping documents that involve third parties, it is important to understand the scope of a broker’s responsibility. The broker is not the shipper. Terms that limit a carrier’s liability must bear the shipper’s signature. Consult with risk management specialists to learn more about the nuances of the Carmack Amendment.

 

Cargo Liability Insurance Might Save Your Company

Transporting perishable cargo, like food items, is a high liability load for a freight carrier. Can a shipper reject a load with a broken seal even if the cargo is undamaged? One case study, Oshkosh Storage Co. v Kraze Trucking, LLC (Wisconsin, 2014), might answer this question and confirm the important of cargo liability insurance for a freight company.

The Circumstances

Kraze was to deliver a shipment of cheese from Minnesota to Wisconsin for Oshkosh.  A refrigerated trailer was sealed at time of pick-up.  Written instructions from shipper to the driver noted that a broken seal or seal not matching the manifest would result in rejection of shipment. Verbal instructions from shipper to the driver indicated that Oshkosh personnel would break the seal upon cargo delivery in Wisconsin. Posted signage at check-in also indicated drivers were not to break seals, that Oshkosh staff would verify seal number and break seal before unloading shipment. Upon delivery the driver parked, broke the seal and opened the trailer. Oshkosh rejected the entire load.

What Happened

The carrier’s insurer salvaged the load at a nearly 30% loss of the original contract price. Oshkosh made a claim under the Carmack Amendment against the carrier, citing the broken seal resulted in “actual loss or injury”, the cheese damaged due to loss of integrity. The carrier argued that a broken seal was not sufficient evidence that the cargo was damaged and did not have direct bearing on the goods such as tampering or direct harm.

What To Learn

The cargo had to be sold at a discounted price because the broken seal affected the integrity guaranty from Oshkosh to consumers.  The carrier was deemed negligent for breaking the seal. The decrease in product value was defined as an “actual loss or injury”. A broken seal by the carrier makes it impossible to prove that goods have not been tampered with and a food product contaminated. Food distribution requires an extra care of duty toward the public for shipment seals to remain intact. Without the protection of cargo liability coverage, the carrier would have suffered an entire loss, as well as payment to the shipper to mitigate damages.

A single case like this can be financially devastating for a freight company. Is your cargo liability insurance adequate? Call a cargo liability insurance expert and find out more about what you need for better coverage.

Advantage of using a Logistics Freight Broker over a Trucking Company

Striking a new business deal in most cases is an opportunity for growth and profitability. Additional business implies an increase in your production output, which the freight company you are using cannot handle depending on resources available. As such, you need to find a solution as soon as possible to meet client demands.

The extra output requires you to find another shipper either to transport part of the cargo or the whole consignment to your customer. Options available in this case, include trucking companies or logistics freight brokers. Both service providers can handle the task. However, as you consider who to engage between the two, here are reasons why you should opt for a logistics freight broker.

Better Management of the Shipment Process

A logistics agent’s main preoccupation is managing transportation procedures right from the pick-up point to delivery. Therefore, these logistics brokers have a better understanding of shipping different types of equipment and commodities, routing, various areas and regions of a country, and lane rates.

Logistics freight brokers advise you better as you plan to ship any consignment due to their extensive experience in shipment procedures.

Access to a Greater Network of Carriers and Trucks

Trucking companies have access to the only fleet of vehicles they have. The implication is that if you have more output or some consignment, you need to deliver urgently, finding a standby truck is sometimes a challenge. That can easily affect your delivery schedules, which affects relationships with your customers as well.

On the contrary, logistics freight brokers are constantly in touch with many carriers and trucks. They know better who is available to handle a task at any one time and their location. Hence, when you need to address urgent deliveries or an output overflow, they are your best option.

Additional Cargo Insurance

Freight business involves several unexpected challenges, which is why cargo insurance is a necessity. Most of those seeking delivery services have cargo insurance, but logistics brokers carry additional cover to protect goods in transit. The cover acts as extra protection in case of any eventuality of launching a claim.

Categories
Quick Links

Get A Quote

Logistiq offers great programs and great pricing. Contact us to request a quick quote.

Get Quote
Follow Us
GOT QUESTIONS. WE HAVE ANSWERS.

Call us now and speak to a LOGISTIQ industry expert. We look forward to your call.